Buying the cheapest, the biggest myth about Procurement
September 4, 2017
It is saddening how some organizations still think the only idea of Procurement is to buy the cheapest. This leads to numerous erroneous opinions about Procurement function and profession in general. Because of this very myth, other departments within organizations try to avoid Procurement department while making strategic decisions. Consequently, in many instances those departments face numerous problems, such as poor service, substandard deliverable or late performance.
It is important to instruct our colleagues and duly inform them about the role and significance of Procurement function in any organization. It is important to bust Procurement myths.
First, in Procurement profession we do not even use the words “cheap”, “cheaper” or “cheapest”. These are banned words. We say “lower in price” or “lowest-priced” or “least expensive”.
Second, we never look at the price, if we are not satisfied with the quality. Even if the price is $0.00.
Third, we do not consider the price if delivery schedule and delivery conditions are not what we requested.
Forth, most often we give zero attention to price if the company offering products or services is not qualified and reliable. Some exceptions might apply for new technologies, know-hows and monopolies.
Fifth, we do not consider the price if a bidder disagrees with the terms of the contract we envisage.
Only after all these criteria are met, Procurement starts reviewing the price.
So, in practice, we might review the prices of only 4 offers out of 20 offers received. The remaining 16 would be filtered out because of the criteria above that come before price.
In other words, price is just one of those numerous factors Procurement considers.
It is vital to acknowledge that, while sourcing best value for the organization, Procurement wears two hats:
The first hat is for dealing with the final recipient of the product or service. Procurement needs to listen carefully and understand all the details and peculiarities of the final deliverable. The price of a mistake here is too high. Any concerns or alternative solutions should be properly discussed before going to market.
The second hat is for dealing with vendors. Here procurement needs to obtain the maximum value for the organization, while keeping the vendors interested and motivated.